Detect, Sense, and Avoid
Currently, separation
of manned aircraft in the NAS is controlled by air traffic controllers (ATC)
that continuously monitor aircraft operations and larger commercial aircraft
carrying traffic alert and collision avoidance systems (TCAS) that perform
cooperative DSA functions with smaller aircraft equipped with conventional
transponders. Very large UAV such as the
Global Hawk or the Reaper may be configured to support transponders, but the
size, cost, and power drain of such a system is generally prohibitive for use
in small UAS operations (Gerold, 2006). As
such, current UAS operations in the NAS is limited and tightly controlled by
the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA).
Aside from model aircraft operation, all unmanned aircraft require FAA
authorization to operate in the NAS. For
public operations (governmental) the FAA issues a Certificate of Authorization
(COA), for civil operations (commercial) the FAA issues a Section 333 Exemption,
and for research and development the FAA issues a Special Airworthiness
Certificate (SAC) in the experimental category (FAA, 2015).“Whether a sense-and-avoid system uses electro-optical cameras, laser radar (LIDAR) devices or transponders, the challenge is to make the devices small and light enough to be deployed on small UAVs” (Marshall, 2013, par. 8). Various solutions to the problem of DSA functions in UAVs include techniques that use radar, visual observers, and manned chase aircraft. Spearhead by a group of European countries and 11 industrial partners one ambitious effort under way in remotely piloted aircraft systems (RPAS) is the development of an integrated system for UAVs called the Mid-Air Collision Avoidance System (MIDCAS) (Marshall, 2013).
Other possible solutions such as ground-based sense and avoid (GBSAA) may offer a near-term alternative to line-of-sight before transitioning to Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast (ADS-B) and the satellite-based Next Generation Air Transportation System (NextGen) due for implementation between 2012 and 2025. The ground based sense and avoid system utilizes a 3D radar system and algorithms in cooperation with ATC and the UAS ground control station (GCS) to determine if there is a danger of collision and notifies the UAV pilot when their aircraft is on a collision path so an evasive action such as altering the flight path of the UAV may be undertaken (Lopez, 2012). ADS-B is a next generation satellite based global positioning system (GPS) avionics surveillance technology incorporating both air and ground aspects. The ADS-B system automatically transmits position and velocity data to the ATC that allows the ATC to monitor and separate aircraft in a more efficient and precise manner than current radar based technology. Since ADS-B utilizes GPS signals it expands surveillance to areas radar is unable to cover (Universal Avionics System Corp., 2013). Although still under research, GBSAA and ADS-B provide the potential for an acceptable level of DSA for UAS in the near future.
References
Federal
Aviation Administration. (2015). Unmanned
Aircraft Systems. Retrieved from http://www.faa.gov/uas/
Gerold,
A. (2006, November 1). UAV: Manned and Unmanned aircraft: Can they coexist? Avionics Today. Retrieved from
http://www.aviationtoday.com/av/issue/feature/UAV-Manned-and-Unmanned-Aircraft-Can-They-Coexist_6115.html#.VAktHEtJXM0
Lopez,
T. (2012, July 5). Radar to allow UAS to fly in national air space. Military News. Retrieved from http://www.military.com/daily-news/2012/07/05/radar-to-allow-uas-to-fly-in-national-air-space.html
Marshall,
P. (2013, July 12). The tech that will
make drones safe for civilian skies. GCN. Retrieved from https://gcn.com/articles/2013/07/12/drone-uav-sense-and-avoid-technologies-civilian-airspace.aspx
Mark,
ReplyDeleteGreat post!
Your reference to the lack of safe operation of UAS in the same airspace of manned aircraft is quite accurate. UAS do not have the same equipment such as transponder, TCAS, or other electronic equipment for several reasons one of which is that no regulation exists yet to make it happen.
There is no regulatory requirement yet to do so. Aircraft owners and operators typically follow the rules but when no rules exist, most people don’t see a need to shell out money on their own to install extra equipment.
The fact is that a lack of the see and avoid equipment on UAS does not just make their safety an issue; it makes all of us who fly unsafe. A collision of a manned aircraft and even the smallest of UAS could prove to be catastrophic. Although the incident was not fatal, the midair collision of a C-130 and a RQ-7 Shadow in Afghanistan could have been much worse. Installation of ‘sense and avoid’ equipment would have averted this incident.
There are ADS-B systems available for UAS from Sagetech that are installed and operational in a few minutes. I have been following the availability of these and other systems in an effort to determine the feasibility of purchasing them for a developing company when the FAA decides to integrate UAS completely.
Freddie
Reference
C-130 Cargo Plane Hits RQ-7 Shadow in Afghanistan. (August 17, 2011). UAS Vision. Retrieved from http://www.uasvision.com/2011/08/17/c-130-cargo-plane-hits-rq-7-shadow-in-afghanistan/
Clarity ADS-B Tracker Kit. (2015). Sagetech. Retrieved from http://www.sagetechcorp.com/